Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McLanahan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Dale Brown#Patrick McLanahan Series. With redirects being generally seen as cheap, and aiding in navigation and searching of the wiki, and from the comment below, this seems like the appropriate course of action. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 02:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Patrick McLanahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This purely fiction article lack source. It does not even have one. I say nothing of its failure to comply with notability requirements. Fleet Command (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect to Dale Brown. Excessively long, way too detailed, entirely in-universe article with no sourcing at all. No need for a merge, since there is enough information about him at the Dale Brown article already.--MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.