Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure.)--180.172.239.231 (talk) 07:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Lin[edit]

Patrick Lin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable - he is just a chef doing his job Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment "Patrick Lin" is too vague. Needs his full name (i.e. Patrick, Lin ______) to actually locate further sources, especially in Hong Kong, considering his many positions with major Hong Kong hotels like the Excelsior Hotel. No stance before that. 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 09:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. 01:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)--180.172.239.231 (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. 01:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)--180.172.239.231 (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. He's more than "just a chef doing his job." He's one of the top chef's in Canada and has tons of coverage to warrant inclusion per WP:GNG. See the following samples of coverage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.