Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Jones (activist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 11:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Jones (activist)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable activist. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This one is hard to put in a particular box. The article has a bit of an incoherent assertion of notability. Is he an author? Activist? Journalist? Poet? Academic? Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:JOURNALIST and WP:ENT, so he would need a strong GNG to counter that. He does pass GNG but not for any of the above - it's for riding his bike across Australia with his family, living off roadkill. On balance I think WP:NOTNEWS applies - it's one of those "man bites dog" type stories that is sure to get clicks but inherently non-notable. Also potentially WP:TOOSOON - if his environmental philosophy gains more exposure in future, he may well become notable. But not yet. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too much of the sourcing is PRIMARY, fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON on what I can see. No real NSUBJECT, and no standout sustained general coverage or aggregated coverage yet. Aoziwe (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.