Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Cannon (barrister)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Cannon (barrister)[edit]

Patrick Cannon (barrister) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article proves subject is a real human, but not that he is notable. References are almost entirely to amazon.com showing he authored some tax books, as well as articles on his personal website. A Google News search finds only one RS (Daily Telegraph) which contains only a quote from him and no biographical information; other references discovered are non-RS (Daily Mail). Chetsford (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient third-party sources to establish notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion which is what a lot of articles on lawyers and businessmen end up being.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing notability as described by WP:GNG. Very little biographical information seems to exist. Nannochloropsis (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable through authorship and recognised expertise on UK tax law; Tolleys is a reputable guide (one of main reference works) and subject has authored and edited its reference works on property taxes over a long period. Further RSs added since creation. Marktristan (talk) 08:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.