Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick's Parabox

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was paraboxical. 💜 melecie talk - 00:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick's Parabox

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

inherently confusing, especially when the box you're on is in the box you're on. given the nature of the game, there's no way to resolve this, so best deleted.^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 02:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- oops. undone. 💜 melecie talk - 02:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Destroy per WP:NOPARADOX as paradoxes are not allowed on the Wikimedia universe. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) 💜 melecie talk - 00:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Recursion

i think this should be deleted because we're deleting WP:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Recursion, so might as well delete this one too ^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 01:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) 💜 melecie talk - 00:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Recursion

i think this should be deleted because we're deleting WP:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Recursion, so might as well delete this one too ^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 01:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

• •

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was paraboxical. 💜 melecie talk - 00:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick's Parabox

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

inherently confusing, especially when the box you're on is in the box you're on. given the nature of the game, there's no way to resolve this, so best deleted.^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 02:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- oops. undone. 💜 melecie talk - 02:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Destroy per WP:NOPARADOX as paradoxes are not allowed on the Wikimedia universe. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.