Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia D. Barksdale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. Consensus is against a standalone article, but I'm not seeing a rationale for deleting before redirecting. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia D. Barksdale

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet either WP:JUDGE or WP:GNG as a failed judicial nominee and judge of a non-statewide court. Perhaps this can be redirected to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. Let'srun (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law, and Florida. Let'srun (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Zero notability for being a failed judicial candidate, career is a mid-level judge otherwise, not what we require for notability here. Zero sources found, what's used in the article isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Redirect as per the recent similar discussions, as article creator. Safiel (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.