Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Cheng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW - WP:PROF is met, which the (extremely new) nominator appears to have been unaware of. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Cheng[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet notability standards. In addition, the article has only two sources and only one relevant link has been spotted in What Links Here. As such, I move to delete this article. EditControl (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Passes WP:Prof with 18 papers with over 100 citations on GS. A ridiculous nomination that brings Wikipedia into disrepute. A WP:Trout for the nominator who has edited for one day with a curious list of contributions: eyes needed here. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Snow keep. Passes WP:PROF#C3 (Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science) as well as a very clear pass of #C1. This may not meet the specific requirements of WP:SK but per WP:SNOW there's no point in dragging it out for the full discussion period. (Also, I removed a comment from the nominator swearing at other participants here without addressing the substance of the nomination; EditControl, don't do that.) —David Eppstein (talk) 23:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep I added the APS Fellowship, which is by itself already enough to pass WP:PROF. XOR'easter (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.