Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patoli
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. with a leave for speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 18:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Patoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All sources that I found for this tribe point back to Wikipedia. Unverifiable. SL93 (talk) 00:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 08:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable or verifiable. History2007 (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep They are a verified Multan tribe.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Wifione Message 16:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 23:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting rationale: Have relisted the article to give time to evaluate the sources presented by Wifione. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 17:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.