Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PatientPak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against redirecting if desired. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PatientPak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No pubmed indexed sources to support its use. Looks like spam. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails GNG and what sources there are describe it as scammy. oy. Jytdog (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
comment Could be redirected to "healthcare-associated infections" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.