Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pati Parameshwar (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pati Parameshwar (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, only 1 review found in BEFORE. Tagged for notability DonaldD23 talk to me 16:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There is indeed the review mentioned above (I suppose the very negative one in The Times of India). And also this one, and this, at least.— MY, OH, MY! 17:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per User:Mushy Yank 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 04:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Mushy_Yank. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree, this is a weak keep, but still limps over the notability bar.Onel5969 TT me 00:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.