Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Griffin (political consultant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Griffin (political consultant)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Described himself as Veteran corporate and political strategist. Major puff piece article that magically appeared fully formed, created by editor with SPA account User talk:Ejdooley. Not a politician. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as advertising alone. SwisterTwister talk 01:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As written, this basically amounts to "résumé of a person who exists", rather than "encyclopedia article about a person whose existence warrants the attention of an encyclopedia". Being named as a Twitter account worth following, sourced only to a listicle that glancingly namechecks his existence without being about him, is not a claim of notability in and of itself — and neither is "appears as a political commentator on the news", sourced nowhere at all. And other than that, all we've got here is "owns a PR company" and "has clients", sourced almost entirely to references that glancingly namecheck his existence while not being about him. Bearcat (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional piece on non-notable person. AusLondonder (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. I can find no suitable independent, reliable sources apart from local media, and that coverage is of a trivial kind. I'm puzzled by one of the sources, used more than once, referring to "Tim Griffin" and not "Pat Griffin" in connection with the firm Purple Strategies. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.