Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasaffe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pasaffe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real evidence of notability - couldn't find many third-party sources that discuss this software. Doesn't seem to merit its own article. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 05:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Aside from wikipedia clones and source/binary repos, very very little. tedder (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage, no evidence that it passes WP:NSOFT. Lagrange 613 03:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.