Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parul Mathur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Parul Mathur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks notability. The article has only one source that itself is way from being enough. A Google search gives no reliable sources. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable at all. –eggofreason^talk 20:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not Delete : It is about an IPS officer. She is a known public figure and a role model for females. Her presence on Google can be searched by typing " Parul Mathur IPS". There are many articles , PDFs and videos available on Google on her which prove her notability. Many such references have been added into the article which prove her notability. — Preceding signed comment added by Workmk (talk • contribs)

Delete: fails notability standards. Unfortunately, being a police officer or being a role model doesn't make somebody notable. We need tangible evidence that the person in question has received sustained, in-depth, meaningful coverage from major, reliable sources. That simply isn't the case here. SITH (talk) 23:07, 26 December 2018
Delete per nom and user above Spiderone 11:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete SP is not a top post of the police department. WP:NSOLDIER can be referred to compare the notability criteria. Due to the lack of any notable work done by the subject, I suggest deletion. The SP gets WP:ROUTINE press coverage, such articles, PDF, or videos cannot be used to claim notability per WP:GNG--DBig Xrayᗙ 15:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.