Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party Crashing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 12:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Party Crashing

WP:NN Neologism Toddst1 (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Crashing" is a commonly used word in Australia for going to a party un-invited, that would be sourceable and is in dictionaries, but for this entry i'm afraid its: au revoir! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is already adequately covered in Rant (novel). I'm kinda surprised we (apparently) haven't had an article on event "crashing" to redirect this to. It isn't even mentioned in Crash disambig, and Wedding Crasher redirects to Geronimo Stilton, a kids' book series about a mouse. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We did. We used to have party crasher, to which gatecrashing was a redirect. It was deleted via Proposed Deletion. Uncle G (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

party crashing and crashing parties are two different things. it's not adequately covered considering party crashing in the real world and party crashing in a novel need to be separately recognized. if wikipedia's about an online encyclopedia it should cover everything, however, because information never needed critics. delete it if it hurts you that much, but it's a nit-picky and arrogant thing to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathersgospel (talk • contribs) 03:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N. Wikipedia only covers everything that is nessessary, nothing else.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 03:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "nessessary" to who? I must have missed that meeting. the wub "?!" 13:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NN, maybe this could be turned into an actual article...something like what Librarianofages said. Oyster guitarist 04:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of this game outside of the novel. Nothing to do with gate crash (which is probably something we could have an article on regardless of the state of the one Uncle G notes is deleted).--Dhartung | Talk 06:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -non-notable other than as dictionary term. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment gatecrashing is what it's known as in the UK, and it's not a neologism, it's been around at least 30 years. Merkinsmum 20:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read the article being discussed. Uncle G (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Much lulz. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 21:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable fictioncruft. The real-world activity of party crashing/gatecrashing might deserve an article at some point, and if it's created this can redirect there, but nothing contained in this article at the moment is worth keeping. Terraxos (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.