Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party! Party! Party!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 1989 Australian Capital Territory general election. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Party! Party! Party![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not to be the party pooper, but despite the humour, this clearly fails WP:N. I could not find any significant coverage in secondary sources (including by searching Google and trove), and the one substantive assertion in the article (its creators did not believe in self-government) is unsourced and I was unable to verify it. Portwalrus (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia. Portwalrus (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 1989 Australian Capital Territory general election. Discussed 30 years after the event: "Provocateur Emile Brunoro registered six parties to contest the poll, including the Sun Ripened Warm Tomato Party, which promised to ban gas-ripened "fake" tomatoes from the ACT. His other parties included Party! Party! Party! and Surprise Party." (Canberra Times, 6 March 2019) Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds quite sensible to me - and information could be added to the Political parties and election process citing this source. Portwalrus (talk) 04:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all citations currently used in the article are primary references. Per the nomination it lacks Sigcov in secondary sources and is therefore not notable. TarnishedPath^talk 10:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Goldsztajn|, because might as well. Cabrils (talk) 06:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above, not notable beyond this single election. ITBF (talk) 12:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.