Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partners In Leadership (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partners In Leadership[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted at last AfD. Doesn't meet WP:ORG ' WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article seems curated mostly by editors with a vested interest in the organization. It has no secondary sources listed at all. There's nothing to indicate it might meet WP:GNG. _signed,Willondon (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - couldn't find any sigcov in secondary sources, I don't believe this meets NCORP or GNG. I'll note the book, same discussions had in the last deletion discussion. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Sources are press releases, and lack of any actual SIGCOV. TLA^tlak 04:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.