Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parochial and technology Schools in Lucas County, Ohio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parochial and technology Schools in Lucas County, Ohio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't prove notability Boleyn (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Although only the high schools are notable, it's a legitimate list and possibly too long to merge to Lucas County, Ohio, though if you want to merge that would be better than deleting. --Colapeninsula (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a worthwhile list. While only the high schools have been deemed notable enough for their own articles, I haven't seen anyone proclaim that we should pretend lower schools don't exist. Also, these mass deletion nominations are profoundly unhelpful. If you're going to nominate an article, please take the time to examine the article and craft a non-generic rationale. - Eureka Lott 15:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - unnecessary over-tagging e.g. duplicate orphan tags by nominator. This is a useful list that is akin to a school district and provides a useful repository of information about otherwise nn schools. Absolutely no benefit to be gained from deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.