Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ParkatmyHouse
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 21:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ParkatmyHouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page mostly serves as an advert for the product 151.225.3.35 (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've moved this AFD to the correct location and added it to the log for June 10. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Very Weak Keep Has plenty of references but not exactly notable. Does seem like an advert though. JguyTalkDone 20:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 11:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. czar · · 11:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 11:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's been the subject of articles in New York Times, Guardian (UK), ABC News (USA), Fast Company, and other publications. That meets WP:GNG. There's also coverage of partnerships and investments with/by major companies and organisations, so the press is more than just "this exists". --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.