Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park lots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Park lots[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notability concern for this article was raised at User talk:Atsme/NPP training/VickKiang, I'm pinging Atsme. Ref 1 and 2 are clearly non-RS, one a blog and another a niche project. Ref 3, despite seemingly being non-RS, is from the University of Toronto, so it's an RS, but it mentions Park lots in a few sentences, along with a couple of other trivial mentions, so it doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:GEOLAND also doesn't apply here. VickKiang (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could be a subsection in the John Graves Simcoe article; refs found are all for parking lots, like where motor vehicles are parked. Oaktree b (talk) 03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete due to lack of apparent notability. Would prefer to redirect this but where to?

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as stated in the discussion. It is non-notable land, offers no encyclopedic value, and as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP should not be used to document every global land transaction that ever occurred. Atsme 💬 📧 10:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not-notable land, as described above.Vicozico13 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to York, Upper Canada#History, which already mentions this. BD2412 T 01:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Atsme is correct. Bruxton (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.