Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Wells
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Paris Wells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'm not sure if supporting notable acts and performing at enormous festivals is enough to assert notability; I'm tempted to think this is OK, but I'm erring on the side of caution and submitting it for thorough perusal by community members better versed in WP:MUSIC than I. Seegoon (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Damn this is tough - her press release here[1] says she's had reviews in a whole bundle of places, Rolling Stone, Sunday Telegraph to give two, but I can't find them any where. Maybe the UKs just too far away and someone in Aus will know where to find some good stuff. She definitely seems notable but it's proving it! How's this [2] stand up us a source? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A good quality source here[3] --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 12:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And a review of her album[4]. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve based on Malcolmxl5's excellent work getting some sources :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the refs given seem to be nontrivial and independent, so that's enough for notability. Rigadoun (talk) 04:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.