Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parampoojya Shri Kalavati Aai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Only Pburka has made an argument for keep, and that is contingent on reliable sources which haven't been found.Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parampoojya Shri Kalavati Aai[edit]

Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if sources can be provided. Appears to be a Hindu saint. Pburka (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment By my statment that there are no reliable sources - specifically I mean that after a search I have found no reliable sources that establish notability. I am aware that no such sources exist in the article. Also, I believe that there are none to be found and that these claims to be a "Hindu saint" must be verified - this claim too has no reliable sources. Such statements must be sourced. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a lot of info here. I wouldn't consider that a reliable source, but it doesn't look made up, either. If that info can be supported by a more reliable source (perhaps in Hindi), she would probably be considered notable. Pburka (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Never heard of her, staying in Maharashtra. Almost no google hits except wiki.[1]--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete by what criteria? Pburka (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —John Z (talk) 07:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is original research, as there is no source, but this article, that says Parampoojya Shri Kalavati Aai is a Hindu saint. As such, this article should be deleted per Wikipedia:No original research. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also, this article is orphaned. As is, the article should be deleted per Wikipedia:No original research. Ism schism (talk) 02:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see the source I provided above. It's not original research. (But the link I found isn't a reliable source, either). Also note that Ism schism is the nominator and has now placed three delete votes. Pburka (talk) 12:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.