Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise, Rose Bay
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 14:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Paradise, Rose Bay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non notable place. Captain panda 02:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Note that this is not a village, town, or other officially-recognised settlement; I assume this is talking about some park in Rose Bay, New South Wales, Australia (or Rose Bay, Tasmania?). This is practically speediable as {{db-nocontext}}, but now that it's here ... based on GNews search [1], doesn't seem notable; just a park in the burbs. cab 03:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Where is this supposed to be? This article helps no one in any way, it's completely unusable. Unschool 04:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Recurring dreams 06:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is talking about Sydney. It's a small, non-notable park. Recurring dreams 06:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per Recurring Dreams. Twenty Years 06:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability questions notwithstanding, the article looks like a joke. "Said to be owned by..." indicates that it is not a serious attempt at an article, and seals it for me. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I often have sympathy for keeping geographical articles, but this is just nonsense. As it doesn't specify which Rose Bay the park is at (we're assuming it's the Sydney one, right?) I cannot see this ever expanding into a useful article. DWaterson 22:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hard to believe that small parks like this one are notable enough.--JForget 02:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pile on delete - Someone close this already - nothing notable about a park run by "King Bob" and "Queen Emma" (or whatever it says). — Giggy 08:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, lacks any context whatsoever, and still doesn't appear to be notable. Lankiveil 10:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.