Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradigm (video game)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Paradigm (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed with the basis that there's coverage for crowdfunding which is not actually convincing for notability and also then a "2016 release"; all of this is still not a convincing objection to my now-remoced PROD. SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral. The sources listed - IGN, Rock, Paper, Shotgun and Engadget - are good, but I'm not sure if it is enough to establish notability. Perhaps it is a WP:TOOSOON situation? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The sources are good, but probably a bit below what is required for an unreleased game. Second choice is to draft space/userfy it and wait until release and see if it still gets coverage. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The sources seem to be fine. It has been covered by IGN, RPS and Engadget. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: While there isn't a reliable sources discussing this, it still gets three from three different reliable publication, which I would say is great. It passes WP:GNG. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.