Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperboy Jack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, no evidence of notability. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Paperboy Jack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources discuss this band. Fails WP:MUSIC indopug (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete despite being a fairly long article, doesn't really assert notability and fails WP:MUSIC pitifully. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
20:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Td7603 (talk)I see plenty of noted referances. perhaps it was referanced incorrectly?
- They are all either the band's own website, CD-selling websites, and other generally unreliable references (Sugarbuzz mag for example, which doesn't look to be professional in any way). We need multiple independent, reliable sources to discuss the band extensively (more than trivial mentions). We're talking about websites/publications like Rolling Stone, Allmusic, the NME etc. indopug (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ok, i see your point. I certianly cannot find anything like that....Td7603 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.