Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Moon (band)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was it's only a keep. The Bushranger One ping only 03:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Paper Moon (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No secondary coverage by reliable source fail WP:BAND The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 14:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete(see below) unless someone can provide a source for the unlikely statement that "Their pop sound has been featured in over 20 films and in such television series including Degrassi, Radio Free Roscoe, Queer as Folk, Falcon Beach, Party of Five, and Departures." Personally I find that hard to believe, given the rest of the article, but if it's true, I reckon that satisfies WP:BAND criteria 10 and possibly 12. In which case, I'll switch !vote to Keep. Yunshui (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The "over 20 films" claim comes from the Album Notes to Paper Moon's "Broken Hearts Break Faster Each Day", http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/paperm2 so I suppose that might be a CopyVio, but
- Degrassi is true, see http://www.tv.com/shows/degrassi-the-next-generation/danger-zone-1263110/
- Search for Paper Moon in film is complicated as PM was the title of a film in 1973.
- Falcon Beach is true, see http://falconbeach.ca/index.aspx?go=/the_music.aspx
- EndearingPublishing say on their website that Paper Moon have done Queer as Folk (Showcase), Radio Free Rosco (sic), Party of Five DVD, Kyle XY (ABC Family). http://endearingpublishing.com/endearing_publishing/past_placements.html, so it seems the 'unlikely' claims are substantially true. Keep Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition to the above, I see from a couple of searches that there's actually a fair amount of coverage in reliable independent sources, including Chart [1], Exclaim!, Vue Weekly, the Leader Post, and the Edmonton Journal. Keep even just on the basis of WP:BAND criterion #1. I'll start adding the sources over the next couple of days. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. Nice work Chiswick Chap and Paul Erik; changing !vote to Keep. Yunshui (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Per reliable sources now in the article that establish topic notability, particularly the newspaper sources. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Specific newspaper sources in the article that appear to est. topic notability include:
- Ash, Amanda (May 2, 2009). "Only During Thunderstorms: Paper Moon", Edmonton Journal, p. D3.
- Matheson, Emmet (May 4, 2006). "Paper Moon endures big changes", Leader-Post, p. D2.
- Block, Sheri (June 15, 2002). "One Thousand Reasons To Stay ... One Reason To Leave: Paper Moon", Leader-Post, p. A12.
- Comment - Specific newspaper sources in the article that appear to est. topic notability include:
- Keep And well done to the editors who demonstrated notability of the subject. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 10:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Good finds. Chart (magazine) is a reliable source, as are others that give coverage to this band. Dream Focus 10:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.