Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Tiramani (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Tiramani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. UPE. Refs are interviews demo'ing products, non-rs patent info and business references. No secondary coverage on a WP:BEFORE. scope_creepTalk 14:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:57, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All of the articles that I can find, like the references here, are about his companies with not enough focus on him for notability. His one company, Boxabl, has an article. What is there about him is probably sufficient coverage. His investment company, 500 Group, does not. I didn't do the research but it is plausible that the latter company is notable. Lamona (talk) 04:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.