Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panuwat Hengthaveephokasub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Panuwat Hengthaveephokasub

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is very weak despite the technical WP:NFOOTBALL pass with 44 mins in the league and 24 mins of cup football spread over 3 cameo appearances. All in all, totalling less than one match in terms of game time. No idea what happened to him after his very, very brief time at Geylang. With regards to the sources in the article, the Geylang source is not independent as it's the club that he played for and also is only a trivial mention anyway. The S-League source is only a trivial mention. A search of his Thai name came back with nothing useful. Likewise when searching in English.

There is consensus within the Wikipedia community that a weak NFOOTBALL pass is insufficient when WP:GNG is not clearly met. I couldn't find sufficient sources addressing Hengthaveephokasub directly and in depth to justify this article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 15:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the third party coverage provided is enough to pass GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst Geylang is technically a third party source, due to the player's affiliation with the club, I'm not sure that it truly meets the 'independent of the subject' requirement of WP:GNG, imho. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.