Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pants pants revolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptre (Talk) 20:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pants pants revolution[edit]
Non-notable bot Ezeu 01:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Deltabeignet 02:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was hoping for a good bjaodn candidate here, but alas it isn't meant as a hoax... (ESkog)(Talk) 02:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Great name, though. Pburka 03:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree, great name. If the 'automated humor' actually worked, it might be noteworthy. Wisco 03:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. funny name though *\o/* Dustimagic *\o/* 03:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if the "automated humour" program actually worked, we would soon see a BJAODNbot creating lots of patent nonsense for us to delete. Or has that already happened? Segv11 (talk/contribs) 06:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Was hoping for BJAODN fodder as well, but was sadly disappointed. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Werdna648T/C\@ 09:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Mushintalk 19:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable chatbot. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 02:15Z
- BJAODN seems to be the only beneficiary possible. Stifle 23:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong Talk 13:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.