Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panorama (GIS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama (GIS)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG/WP:NSOFT. WP:BEFORE failed to locate any good sources - a few mentions in passing. Perhaps some sources exist in Russian? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article in current state fails way below what is required for Wikipedia from views of content and sources. Was dePRODd by myself as might have has potential if website to be believed (though non-English some indication of international note). Was added to appropriate WikiProjects but has not been improved and rightfully if not improved should be deleted. NB: I personally am not looking to rescue this one unless something magics out of somewhere.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:GNG, has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - Epinoia (talk) 03:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.