Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankajakasthuri
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ansh666 04:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Pankajakasthuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failed AfC submission. Article creator copied all text (including AfC templates) and pasted into mainspace. Lack of reliable sources. I question it's notability. Vermont | reply here 12:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment, there are a couple of refs from The Hindu which look ok, it was declined at afc because these weren't enough. Szzuk (talk) 10:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. The founder appears to be notable but notability is not inherited. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 13:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.