Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously declined multiple times and creator tried to misguide each time by changing the title of the subject such as "Pankaj Chaturvedi", "Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi" and now "Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist". Likely covert advertising. Fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per ~~WP:G4~~ (not qualified as it was speedy deleted before not via discussion) and WP:G11. Third time is not the charm for this article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G11. I have a hard time accepting articles which give three sources for "Dr. Chaturvedi is one of the first Indian doctors to be felicitated in House of Commons, British Parliament for his contribution in the field of Dermatology in 2018." when none of these sources even mentions this at all. Coupled with the earlier deleted attempts, best to just get rid of it and give the creator a final warning about this creation (and others like it). Fram (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easily passes WP:GNG. The article has several references which independently discusses his career, life and work in fair depth. Wiki Engineers (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G11. Basically written for the purposes of promotion. --MuZemike 14:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: per nom, G11 -- DaxServer (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Ab207 (talk) 17:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:SALT all three titles. Having been recreated with a third title after being speedily deleted per WP:G11 twice is an instant and massive red flag. While I note that WP:G11 for this version of the article was declined by Bbb23, I consider this to be sufficient evidence for WP:DELREASON#14 (Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia), specifically WP:NOTPROMO. TompaDompa (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a major medical practitioner and has received significant press coverage, pass WP:GNG.- Danish Daniel 99 (talk) 12:45, 04 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.