Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangaj Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pangaj Productions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a film production company that fails WP:GNG. Claim of award with no reliable references to support the claim. Fails WP:RS Lapablo (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Several news papers are linked. If not should this be listed under Hennry (producer)? Papa Captcha (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not a single reference about this company that meets the criteria for establishing notability and a number of the references in the article don't even mention the company. There might be a case for creating an article on "Henry" or "Hennry", the producer, but the starting point for such an article wouldn't necessarily be this one. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 22:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Fails WP:NORG. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.