Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandimensional sub-quantum topography
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The text of the article just gives the title in simpler words. Nothing comes up on Google for the title apart from the article and its' mirrors. Mike Peel 12:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The only saving grace is that the subject topic is guaranteed to get you laid. OBM | blah blah blah 13:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pavel Vozenilek 13:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article cites no sources. No sources on the purported subject are to be found. I suspect that the hyperintelligent pandimensional beings have removed all trace of this from the Earth in order to avoid corrupting the program. Delete, lest they dice your brains! Uncle G 14:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, since I prefer my brain to remain in a non-diced state. PJM 14:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete substub. Gazpacho 17:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is obviously wrong. Sub-quantum particles are, by definition, impossible, as quanta are defined as the fundamental particles. This, combined with the lack of sources and the fact that there is nothing IN the article, pretty well points towards deletion. -Amarkov babble 23:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.