Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pancho's Hideaway (cartoon)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1960–69). No need for a standalone article, but since the short is covered in the target, let's have a redirect. ♠PMC(talk) 15:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pancho's Hideaway (cartoon) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:N. I could not locate reliable secondary sources that verify the notability of the subject. Only sources located were IMDB-like, or places where you can watch the cartoon. Comatmebro (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 21:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or apply a new standard to all similar articles- If this isn't notable enough, then you have to remove a ton of other articles too. There seems to be an article for just about every looney tunes ever made.--Rusf10 (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Just being a Looney Tunes cartoon should not be enough to establish notability. Per WP:NFILM, a film ought to have significant coverage from reliable sources to qualify as notable enough for an article. The only sources provided here are database entries, not significant coverage. There are some Looney Tunes cartoons which have received better coverage from reliable sources than what has been provided here; see, for example, Jerry Beck's The 100 Greatest Looney Tunes Cartoons (2010). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.