Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Rambo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - jc37 02:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Rambo

Delete was speedied by me as A7, another admin restored it contending that this one-liner asserted notability. She's so nn we don't know where or when she was born, what work she has done, what coloring she has credits for, how precisely she has worked in the biz and where are the reliable sources showing significant coverage as we require for WP:BIO and WP:N. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Busy lady, if the Comic Book Database is correct; she's done quite a lot of work on a number of books. Problem is, nobody seems to have discussed her work - anywhere. I don't think we can do much without several more sources; if they aren't available, delete and leave it to the specialist Wikis (she's listed on Memory Alpha, Wookiepedia and a couple others already). Tony Fox (arf!) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I restored it because it asserted significance. We don't speedy things we think are not notable, we speedy things which do not assert signoficance. I have edited the article, adding the things Carlos could not find, and would like to point out WP:BIO and WP:N are guidance, not policy. I believe this article is informative and allows us to build the web, thus improving the encyclopedia. Hiding T 14:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The references Hiding has added ought to establish notability, in particular the Comic Con award. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Keep - Good start. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Very POV article; if she is so accomplished, surely there ought to be more hard facts about her. Deb (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.