Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pam Eddinger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pam Eddinger[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

president of a community college does not meet WP:PROF Cabayi (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that this educator passes WP:Prof. No other claims. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Keep A college with over 13,000 students is significant, whether "community" or not; being president of two such colleges in succession meets WP:PROF#C6. News coverage (a sampling of the better hits I found on a first pass: [1][2][3][4][5]) meets WP:GNG. Being an education expert for the transition teams of two successive governors counts toward WP:PROF#C7. XOR'easter (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being a community college president is not automatically notable, but neither is it automatically non-notable; it needs additional evidence in the form of in-depth reliable independent coverage (WP:GNG). Sources 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ones listed by XOR'easter provide that coverage. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am in agreement with XOR'easter that being the president of Massachusetts' largest community college, larger than many universities in the United States, meets the requirements for WP:PROF#C6. — Pontius Aquila (talk)
Keep per @XOR'easter & @David Eppstein. Meets WP:GNG and several points of WP:PROF. The nominator should have done some WP:BEFORE. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Here's another source: When Grit Isn't Enough. Andrew D. (talk) 07:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well done to all those above for finding more sources. I am convinced that she passes WP:GNG. 17:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardx (talk • contribs)
Keep -- 13,000 students is a significant institution of higher learning, whether it's designated as a community college or not. Meets WP:PROF, in my mind, + sources above. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep solely on the basis of Bunker Hill CC being the largest CC in Massachusetts per WP:PROF#C6. However, this really does need improved sourcing. Chetsford (talk) 22:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes the SNG for academics as head of a major academic institution. Carrite (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.