The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Beagel (talk) 10:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's got no sources covering, and it's likely a soapbox / advert -- Whpq (talk) 15:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
