Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian Peruvian
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Palestinian Peruvian[edit]
- Palestinian Peruvian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable, unsourced, possible hoax, part of a series of dubious "culture X in country Y" articles
PROD was removed without improving the article [1].
see also:
- Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Japanese_Costa_Rican
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaicans in Switzerland
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaicans in Switzerland (2nd nomination)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese Jamaican
- Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jamaican_Brazilian
- User_talk:Cup22
- Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Troy86
- Special:Contributions/70.149.57.84
- [2]
—rybec 06:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and the history in previous AfD discussions on these types of articles. You could create an article for every combination of foreign ethnicity living in every country and unless there is particular history or other useful information, besides the fact that they exist, that should be documented in an encyclopedia I believe it fails general notability standards. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 08:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.