Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pale Rider (Drapht album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, withdrawn by nominator. Many more sources added. Canley (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pale Rider (Drapht album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn by nominator Flat Out (talk) 03:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS. "Articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to into the artist's article or discography." Flat Out (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Little more than a tracklisting and infobox - not enough for a standalone article. Nothing really to merge and a redirect from this title wouldn't be useful. --Michig (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Access to three reviews, airplay on Triple J, passes WP:NALBUMS.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)02:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC) It could be expanded to start class.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reviews of this album. --Michig (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete some of the sources are not reputable music press. Simply being played in Triple J does not give a free pass to notability.LibStar (talk) 12:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - satisfies WP:NALBUMS, is definitely more than a basic stub article. Dan arndt (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please explain how it meets NALBUMS. LibStar (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

has been subject of multiple independent reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.