Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pale-legged Warbler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Close - A misplaced redirect has now been converted into a stub. (Non-administrator closing). --Tikiwont 11:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pale-legged Warbler[edit]
- Pale-legged Warbler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The page Pale-legged Warbler, Basileuterus signatus, redirects to Pale-legged Leaf-warbler, Phylloscopus tenellipes, but a quick Google of the latin names shows that they are two different species. The page should be deleted until the species page is written
Comment. Couldn't someone just create a short stub?Keep now the stub has been created Nuttah68 19:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. Much discussion has concluded that species are inherently notable, so deleting the redirect page appears to be unnecessary. Agree with Nuttah68, however, that the best course would be to knock up a short stub,
but if no-one feels up to the task the most appropriate redirect would seem to be Basileuterus. Espresso Addict 21:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Now done. Espresso Addict 22:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep now that there is an article; we have RfD, but it would possible not have been noticed there--I wonder about the fairness and utility of some of the XfDs. DGG (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.