Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palak Pe Jhalak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palak Pe Jhalak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable show. No refs, no claim of notability, no in depth coverage obvious in google. PROD removed without the addition of sources. Merge and redirect to That's_So_Raven#Indian_Adaptation possible. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per no rason. 333 -blue 09:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep likely because this only started airing recently and other shows such as The Suite Life of Zack & Cody version The Suite Life of Karan & Kabir is existing (even though it apparently only went for two season). SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (state) 10:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to That's_So_Raven#Indian_Adaptation. I doubt it would ever get any "in depth coverage" the nominator wants. And even if it gets some it can be mentioned in the main article. Nothing encyclopedic to merge anyways. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - marginally notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 04:44, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.