Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paladyn. Journal of Behavioral Robotics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12 (copyvio of http://versita.com/science/engineering/paladyn/authors/aims_and_scope/). —David Eppstein (talk) 05:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Paladyn. Journal of Behavioral Robotics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New journal in the process of being established. Has not published a single article yet and, according to its web site, does not even have its editorial team in place as they are still looking for associate editors. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N. Note: article restored after challenge to deletion due to expired prod, see User talk:Jclemens#Paladyn. Journal of Behavioral Robotics. Crusio (talk) 08:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 08:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. This way if Paladyn takes off, it's easier to recreate. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 16:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as copyvio and do not userify. I have listed it foor speedy deletion as a copyvio of the journal home page. That would definitvely prevent keeping it even in user space. Even if the article were rewritten, the journal is not even in Ulrich's which is a usual minimum standard. Nor would Ulrich's include it, for it has not yet published a single issue. In the circumstances it fails CRYSTAL, and in the circumstances, , the article is very close to speedy deletion as entirely promotional. DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.