Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakuranga Heights School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pakuranga Heights School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is any more notable than most primary schools. It is generally accepted that primary schools are not notable by default. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the article about the locality, Pakuranga which has a section on "Schools" that just says there were no schools before 1960 and students went to school elsewhere. This is per past practice for primary schools, which amounts to a de facto notability standard for schools. The school's website makes no mention of being part of a "school district," which is the other usual merge target. Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT|not a directory of everything that exists]. Edison (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nomination - doesn't seem notable. bobrayner (talk) 14:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.