Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan News Today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither keep !voter actually refuted the argument that there is no coverage in reliable sources. Even WP:NEXIST requires some indication why sources are likely to exist. So Why 11:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan News Today

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable online website. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheMagnificentist 12:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I expect there to be secondary sources in Urdu. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and possibly Retitle — I think this publication is actually called Pakistan News. Carrite (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable online newspaper. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEBCRIT and WP:ORG. It's listed among several hundred other "online newspapers" on some blogs but that's about it. "Pakistan News" makes the search even harder as most of them are about the country's news not newspaper. If there are any secondary sources in Urdu, they should be presented here or added to the article but providing there are none, the article should be deleted. The burden is on the author to add those sources to establish notability. — Za wl 14:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.