Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paheena

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paheena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Okay originally I thought this was about a actual group until looking into it and even the name of the person that made this page makes this seem suspicious. Wgolf (talk) 06:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • -Nwlaw63-Same here. I was originally doing the tags of notability and refs needed until I decided to look at it closer and then I caught the name of the user who made it. Since I was thinking I could do a speedy but you never know. Wgolf (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: If you are one of the editors who got a notification that you were mentioned on this page, even though you aren't, it seems that it was due to an editor accidentally transcluding a talk page here, which resulted in everyone mentioned on that talk page being notified. The talk page has now been de-transcluded. Please ignore the notification. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.