Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page Ahead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page Ahead

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable NGO that’s fails to satisfy WP:NGO as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE search shows hits in primary sources and other user generated and self published sources which we do count as reliable as they aren’t independent of the NGO. A review of most of the sources used in the article all pr sponsored, press releases, and mere announcements. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HistoricalAccountings (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless some is able to find in depth coverage in RIS that I’m not seeing. Mccapra (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per lacking sources. Tbyros (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage.LucyLucy (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.