Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageTiger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PageTiger[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not able to find enough coverage from notable sources about this company. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete from all the glory, only founders knows his childhood :) definitely influenced, non-notable promotional blog written as wiki artcle. and Really? who cares? "1999 - PageTiger founder Henry Weston formed Communikator Publishing Limited to produce a consumer magazine (Vivid) for haircare brand Wella. Vivid featured interviews with fashion icons including Jennifer Love Kewitt and Heidi Klum". Light2021 (talk) 21:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 14:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I’m not seeing anything here to indicate notability. Mccapra (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definetly non-encyclopedia and non notable. --James Richards (talk) 15:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article, no evidence of notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 15:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as wholly promotional per nom and all above. --Lockley (talk) 18:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As noted above this seems largely promotional (indeed it reads more like an advert or corporate website than an encyclopedia entry) and there is no sign of notability. Dunarc (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater (^{🦉 talk} _talk🦉) 19:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sufficiently significant independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.