Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageRain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PageRain[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines, per WP:GNG. Pahunkat (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Somewhat promotional in tone. The company seems to be defunct. Archive.org suggests it hasn't had a meaningful website since 2016 and nobody seems to have even noted its demise as far as I can tell from a quick Google. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches find routine listings and a user-submitted review, but nothing to demonstrate that it ever attained WP:NWEB / WP:NCORP notability. AllyD (talk) 13:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem to have been notable when it existed, less notable now that it seems to be gone. Jeepday (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the network. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.