Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Lala's
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Aoidh (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Paco Lala's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced stub about a lesser known Mexican TV host. Page has been practically unsourced since its creation. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. CycloneYoris talk! 01:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Mexico. AllyD (talk) 08:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - His name is spelled wrong. It should be "Paco Lalas". Just from a basic google search, he's a fairly notable name with a decent bit of coverage: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Paco+Lalas%22&client=firefox-b-1-d&biw=1920&bih=947&ei=I24kZKarDIKs5NoP2ZqZsA0&ved=0ahUKEwjmyMKMzoH-AhUCFlkFHVlNBtYQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=%22Paco+Lalas%22&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzIECAAQHjIECAAQHjIECAAQHjIECAAQHjIECAAQHjIECAAQHjIGCAAQBRAeMgQIABAeMgYIABAFEB46CQgAEB4QDRCwAzoHCAAQHhCwAzoLCAAQBRAeEA0QsAM6CQgAEAgQHhCwAzoGCAAQCBAeOggIABCKBRCGAzoGCAAQBxAeOggIABAIEAcQHjoKCAAQCBAHEB4QCjoICAAQBRAHEB5KBAhBGAFQVFiUDGC8EGgBcAB4AIABUogB2wGSAQEzmAEAoAEByAEJwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#ip=1 KatoKungLee (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- But is he notable though? I'm not sure if these search results are enough to warrant a standalone article for this individual. I guess deletion would be preferable, since there's an obvious lack of notability in my opinion. CycloneYoris talk! 05:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.