Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Package Waste via Express Delivery in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Package Waste via Express Delivery in China

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This is not an encyclopedia article about a thing that happens; it's an original research essay about something the creator is proposing as a model for what should start happening. Sample text: "The origin of ecommerce dates back to the invention of electricity, computers, cables and the internet." (Wowee zowee, I'm so glad an encyclopedia told me that electricity and the internet were prerequisites for e-commerce — I might never have guessed otherwise!) This is simply not something that belongs on an encyclopedia in this form — I'd have deleted it already if I could find a speedy criterion that it fit into. Bearcat (talk) 06:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well-intentioned but quite unsuitable essay.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unabashed WP:OR. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.